Ambiguous Language in Wada Evaluations
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Ambiguous Language and Consensus∗
Standard economic models cannot capture the fact that information is often ambiguous, and is interpreted in multiple ways. Using a framework that distinguishes between the language in which statements are made and the interpretation of statements, we show that ambiguity can have important consequences. We show that players can agree to disagree in the presence of ambiguity, even if there is a c...
متن کاملFunctional MRI measurement of language lateralization in Wada-tested patients.
In this study the use of functional MRI (fMRI) for measuring language lateralization non-invasively was examined. The subjects were seven patients with histories of temporal lobe epilepsy who had undergone Wada testing for pre-surgical evaluation. Four patients were left-hemisphere-dominant and three were right-hemisphere-dominant for language. They received fMRI scans while they made semantic ...
متن کاملLanguage assessment in Wada test: Comparison of methohexital and amobarbital
INTRODUCTION Methohexital has replaced amobarbital during Wada testing at many centers. The objective of our study was to compare the use of methohexital and amobarbital during Wada testing regarding language and memory lateralization quotients as well as speech arrest times. METHODS A chart review of 582 consecutive patients undergoing 1041 Wada-procedures was performed (left=60, right=63, b...
متن کاملAmbiguous language and common priors
Standard economic models cannot capture the fact that information is often ambiguous, and is interpreted in multiple ways. Using a framework that distinguishes between the language in which statements are made and the interpretation of statements, we demonstrate that, unlike in the case where there is no ambiguity, players may come to have different beliefs starting from a common prior, even if...
متن کاملAmbiguous Language and Differences in Beliefs
Standard models of multi-agent modal logic do not capture the fact that information is often ambiguous, and may be interpreted in different ways by different agents. We propose a framework that can model this, and consider different semantics that capture different assumptions about the agents’ beliefs regarding whether or not there is ambiguity. We consider the impact of ambiguity on a seminal...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Epilepsia
سال: 2004
ISSN: 0013-9580,1528-1167
DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.04005.x